Let us see once again what Grundy (1942) [op.cit.] tells us…
The early steam-engine indicators used a piston balanced by a spring but as the speeds of steam-engines for driving plant like dynamos, then i.c. engines, increased such indicators were soon out of their ability.
Reducing the piston size and stroke, and using fully-rotating rather than oscillating indicator-card drums, reduced inertia problems but the limit was around 1000rpm.
The first example of replacing the piston with a spring-steel diaphragm was probably the Clarke & Lowe Optical Indicator described in Engineering, July 10, 1885. A ray of light reflected from the surface of the diaphragm created the trace photographically.
These cope with higher speeds but can have an inherent problem of the diaphragm’s own resonance.
It was soon found that a large passage from cylinder to diaphragm affects the compression-ratio of an i.c. engine, making the test inaccurate. That was solved by making the diaphragm unit fit as a screwed plug, like a sparking-plug or injector.
The next step was an electrical transducer: piezo-electric (a quartz in Grundy’s day – it would be an artificial ceramic material now), electro-magnetic coupling (as in an electric guitar), capacitance variation (as Howard states) or by resistance variation in carbon discs (analogous to a carbon microphone).
The varying voltage with pressure was fed to the Y-axis of an oscilloscope whose X-axis modelled the crank-angle by a timing unit.
These systems became quite sophisticated, as in the ‘Standard Cathode Ray Engine Indicator’ produced by Standard telephones & Cables, Ltd., of London. Made for testing c.i.-engines, this detected the fuel-valve movement as well as the gas pressure; the latter via rate of change.
….
The “Farnborough”… JA’s friend had bought….
Dr. Grundy tells us all about the “Farnboro” [sic] Electric Indicator, made by Dobbie McInnes Ltd. of Galsgo – perhaps more familiar to most of us for their piston-type steam-engine indicators.
This, Dr. Grundy’s book says in a footnote on p.687, is also known as the “R.A.E. Electric Indicator”. I.e. Royal Aircraft Establishment, Farnborough.
This large, complex machine used a spark-point to record a diagram approximately 12″ long by up to 6″ high, on a drum revolved at half or actual engine speed. The author is not clear on this, but I assume the trace was on a (sensitised?) paper pro-forma wrapped round the drum.
The transducer is a water-cooled disc-valve, or diaphragm, in a unit screwed into a test-point in the cylinder. It balances the engine’s internal pressure against an applied pressure, and it forms the contact-breaker in the recording-spark circuit.
The valve’s travel is <0.01″ , between two seats that are the circuit’s earth-point, so it moves only at the instant the cylinder and balance pressures pass each other. The balance supply, whose maximum pressure has to exceed the engine’s, was compressed air or for better unit life, nitrogen.
Since this equal point occurs twice in each engine cycle, a set of pressure-points w.r.t. to time over the whole cycle, is obtained in steps by adjusting the balance pressure. As this records each point pair over very many cycles, it averages the normal slight variations between cycles. The time difference from step to step is given by the spark-point being directly related to the crankshaft’s, hence drum’s, angle of rotation.
The pressure-displacement travel of the indicator’s tracing point was achieved by a separate assembly, a spring-balanced piston gauging the balance-gas pressure.
So the system relayed sets of many averages from the electro-mechanical transducer to the recorder itself. Rather than the recorder reading the engine pressure directly; although the conventional indicator will also produce an average as the mid-line of a slightly blurred trace.
The diagram shows a 3-cylinder engine but presumably Dobbie-McInnes could supply these sets with additional transducers and associated, extra pipes and electrical fittings.
The “Farnboro” Indicator could also test the induction and exhaust pressures, balanced against a depression drawn by a hand-pump.
Obviously all these systems rely on either the transducer unit also holding the spark-pug or injector, or a separate test-point in the cylinder-head, normally fully filled by a plug.
………….
The idea of electrical-discharge recording on sensitised paper was still current (oh dear) in the 1980s.
At the time I worked for a local electronics company that designed and sold its own make of Sidescan Sonar for sea-bed imaging. It formed the image on a continual web of special paper fed past a revolving drum carrying a pair of single-turn helical electrodes rather like model lawnmower blades, one each port and starboard.
Each electrode passed a current through the paper to a return platen, inversely proportional to the echo from each point in the swathe of ultrasonic pulses insonnifying the sea-bed, to create a false-colour line picture resembling an old TV image in fetching purplish-brown. The stronger the return the lighter the image, to create the contrast between sediment, objects and their acoustic shadows.
I helped only assemble the recorders but I would guess the system created its own time-base to follow the delay between near and far echoes. (Speed of sound in sea-water averages 1500m/s.) I don’t know if there was also a distance-proportional amplifier to compensate for the range attenuation.
You had to be careful to store the plot properly because the paper was also slowly light-sensitive.
I do not know if the ‘Farnboro’ also used similar paper. Even the book’s illustration does not tell us.