How to determine the pressure angle of gears

Advert

New Replies

Report Bug

Help/FAQs

How to determine the pressure angle of gears

This topic has 16 replies, 12 voices, and was last updated 5 December 2010 at 22:25 by Anonymous.

Viewing 17 posts - 1 through 17 (of 17 total)

Author

Posts
18 November 2010 at 18:47 #58935
Clive Pearson
Participant
@clivepearson29808
I need to remake two of the gears in the lead screw gearbox of my Harrison L5 Lathe ( 3 speed ) .Since the new gears will have to mesh with some of the existing gears I understand it is important that they are both cut with the same pressure angle commonly 14.5 or 20 degrees.Having read Ivan Laws book Gears and Gear Cutting I still am unable to see how you determine the pressure angle from the physical dimensions of the existing gears .Any suggestions please .The gears are aprox. 2.5ins. dia.
Advert

18 November 2010 at 18:47 #5295
Clive Pearson
Participant
@clivepearson29808
18 November 2010 at 19:11 #58937
Michael Cox 1
Participant
@michaelcox1
Hi Clive,

I recently had the same problem of determining the pressure angle of a gear. The most successful way is described here:

http://mikesworkshop.weebly.com/change-gear-pressure-angle.html

I hope this helps

Mike
18 November 2010 at 21:18 #58942
Peter G. Shaw
Participant
@peterg-shaw75338
Hey Mike,

That’s excellent.

Although I haven’t yet tried any gear wheel cutting, I have used CAD to draw circles and teeth using Ivan Law’s ideas in his book, indeed his approximation was the only way I could draw some teeth – I forget which way round it is, but depending on the number of teeth, the pitch circle is either inside or outside one of the other circles, and this means that either the involute curve can be drawn, or it cannot. The reason why it cannot is because it cannot be extended backwards. Using Law’s approximation gives success.

But your idea to determine the pressure angle, assuming you are the same Mike, is excellent.

Regards,

Peter G. Shaw
18 November 2010 at 22:57 #58945
Michael Cox 1
Participant
@michaelcox1
Hi Peter,

Thanks for your kind words.

The website is mine.

Mike
18 November 2010 at 23:08 #58948
Clive Foster
Participant
@clivefoster55965
Fortunately for those lacking high CAD skills, or even CAD at all, there is an adequate direct measurement method for determining the PA of normal involute gears. I lifted this from a reliable source and its worked out fine for me

Firstly you need to know the diametrical pitch, DP, of the gear, basically number of teeth per inch of pitch circle diameter. For practical purposes pitch circle diameter runs round half way up the tooth. As its always a whole number and only a few numbers are used best guess estimation is usually good enough unless you are watch making.

Given the DP take a measurement over any reasonable small number of teeth with whatever equipment you have. 3 to 5 teeth for a chord length of around 1/8 of a circle usually does just fine. Multiply the cosine of the ‘PA’ by 3.1416 and divide by the ‘DP’ add this to your measurement, this should be the measurement over one more tooth if its not the same, change the the ‘PA’ and try again.

Example:-

10dp 14.5 pa, 30 teeth,

Measurement over 3 teeth .776″,

Cos 14.5° = 0.986147

(0.986147 x 3.1416) = 3.04

3.04/10 = 0.304

0.304″ + 0.776″ = 1.080″ which will be the measurement over 4 teeth if the gear is

14.5° PA.”

Obviously 10 DP is easy on the maths.

In practice you only have 14.5° and 20° pressure angles to choose from for general purpose gears so the difference is usually pretty conclusive. Its not an exact to umptyfour decimal places calculation, just a nearest to result for separating sheep and goats. I’d be very careful with gears having heavily modified addendum, dedendum and teeth shape tho’. It works, after a fashion, with stub teeth but some judgement is needed.

There is probably a direct version for module gears but substituting nearest DP is good enuf.

Heavily engineered devices such as car and motorcycle gearboxes often include gear pairs which are way outside standard formulae. Especially Japanese motorcycle gearboxes where its not uncommon to find teeth numbers up to one tooth different from what the standard formulas give for gears of that DP or Module and diameter.

Clive

Edited By Clive Foster on 18/11/2010 23:09:49
19 November 2010 at 09:31 #58954
John Olsen
Participant
@johnolsen79199
Speaking of Japanese gearboxes….back a few years (like in the seventies) I was rebuilding a Honda 100 that I had thrashed to death. Checking the gears, I found signs of wear on one of them. Checked the part number, ordered a new one, and put the bottom end together. It bound up…so I thought that can’t be right, took it down again. After a bit of two and fro, I found that the new gear had one more teeth than the old one. So I took it out, and took both of them to the dealer. We tried again, sending the old and new pair to the importer…still came back with one that wouldn’t fit. Third try we managed to get the importer to check more carefully and they sent one that was correct.

I still wonder how it came about that they had the wrong ones…it can’t have been a modification because the mating gear would also have to change, and it is unlikely that increasing one gear by one tooth and reducing the mating one is going to work, there was no sign of any different mating gears anyway. (I was changing both, as one does.) My only theory is that someone made a mistake setting up the machine for a batch of spares…I wonder how many got put in without the problem being spotted? The gearbox would go together, but did not rotate as freely as it should have. I bet they didn’t last too long like that.

Before anyone makes any critical remarks, my other bike at the time was a Triumph 250 single of exactly the same year, and that had problems that were far more serious built in.

regards

John
19 November 2010 at 11:56 #58961
Howard Jones
Participant
@howardjones35282
too many opportunities for error in that method.

an american guy gave me the simplest method.

get a piece of glass.

roll out a sausage of plasticene on the glass.

roll the gear along the plasticene to make a plasticene rack.

measure the angle of the slope of the rack tooth face.

this corresponds to the pressure angle.
19 November 2010 at 12:38 #58964
Michael Cox 1
Participant
@michaelcox1
Hi Howard,

I tried the plasticene sausage method and could not get repeatable results. I also had problems on my mod 1 gears with the plasticene detaching cleanly from the gear.

Mike
19 November 2010 at 19:15 #58973
Sub Mandrel
Participant
@submandrel
my mod 1 gears with the plasticene detaching cleanly from the gear.

Try WD40 on the plasticene

Neil
21 November 2010 at 01:27 #59026
Billy Mills
Participant
@billymills
Why not try rebuilding the missing/damaged teeth instead of making the whole gear. There are a few articles on the web from dovetailing in a new block of metal to inserting pins and then weld metal. A form tool to fit whatever the gap profile is- which you would need anyway- then cut the gaps you need.

Regards,

Alan.
21 November 2010 at 11:28 #59047
MICHAEL WILLIAMS
Participant
@michaelwilliams41215
A good DIY method is to make a gauge with just one complete rack tooth of specified pressure angle filed on it – this is easy to do since the important areas are all flat sided and easily made and measured . Test the gauge into any gap between teeth on an existing gear wheel whereon gauge will do any of jam , fit or rattle . If it fits (and rolls around smoothly in the tooth slot ) pressure angle is correct .

A higher precision variant of the above is a gauge with two complete rack teeth tested over outside of one gearwheel tooth but it is much harder to do and little advantage in this case .

There are various toolroon methods of determining pressure angle using measurements over rollers in the tooth slot but these are a bit fiddley in small gears .

If you are planning to make your own gear cutters you don’t actually need to know the pressure angle – tooth profiles don’t change much for small variations of number of teeth so match cutter profile to shape of any suitable gear with something like correct number of teeth .
4 December 2010 at 18:09 #59956
Anthony Ashgrove
Participant
@anthonyashgrove58555
Hi Clive,

I have an exel spreadsheet for gear cutting data, by measuring your existing gears dia and no of teeth etc you should be able establish the PA of your gears, if you want a copy please email me aashgrove@yahoo.com, also get a catalogue from HPC Gears very useful!!

regards

Tony Ashgrove
4 December 2010 at 22:42 #59972
Anonymous
Errr I don’t think so, the OD of the gear and the number of teeth will enable you to determine the DP of the gear, but they’ll tell you absolutely nothing about the PA.

Regards,

Andrew
4 December 2010 at 23:13 #59976
John Stevenson 1
Participant
@johnstevenson1
It is possible to define the PA by measuring over 3 or 5 teeth and a set of tables.

However the tolerances in commercial gears is that wide they exceed the differences between 14.5 and 20 degrees PA.

Another problem is many commercial gears are modified to give stronger tooth forms, quieter running that it puts all normal calculations out the window.

Take these three gears, all cut on the same OD but only the 22 tooth is correct as regards normal calculations.

Trying to measure anything on the 21 and 20 teeth will get you nowhere but they are all 20 PA gears.

John S.
5 December 2010 at 11:56 #59991
Anthony Ashgrove
Participant
@anthonyashgrove58555
Andrew,

In my defence, you have not seen the spreadsheet so cannot seeall the data it provides. The PA affects the tooth length, so you can identify the different PA’s the spreadsheet gives all the critical measurements of the tooth not just OD so I believe you can establish the PA, by the way you can calculate gear data for any PA not just the 14.5 or 20 degree PA commonly used, if you would like a copy please ask.

Regards

Tony Ashgrove
5 December 2010 at 22:25 #60032
Anonymous
Hi Tony,

Indeed I haven’t seen the spreadsheet, and if it contains extra information, then I am sure it is possible to determine the PA. My point was that it is isn’t possible to determine the PA given only the OD and number of teeth. I’m not sure what the ‘tooth length’ refers to, but I would be interested in seeing a copy of the spreadsheet. I’ve sent you an email request for same.

Regards,

Andrew
Author

Posts