With thanks to Christiaan Huygens for discovering the Cycloid
… and a nod of respect to all those who participated in the recent, somewhat lively, discussion.
Here is a screen-grab from a little exercise I have just done in QCAD
.
.
First I created a ‘wheel’ with 96 spokes, then attached a green marker at one point on the circumference, and yellow markers at three more locations on a radial extension to that spoke. [thus mimicking what dave8 described]
Then drew the circumference of the wheel, plus a ‘road’ of equal length on another layer, and hid the original wheel [to avoid cluttering the image]
Grouping the four markers, and then copying that group ‘displaced & rotated’ to the other 95 positions produced four elegant curves … one of which is a Cycloid; but I know not what to call the others.
.
.
MichaelG.
.
Discuss or ignore as you wish … My own curiosity is satisfied
MichaelG.
.
Note: __ With hindsight, I don’t think creating the ‘spokes’ served any useful purpose … except to keep my mind focussed on what I was doing.
.
Edit: __ Apologies, I seem to have red dots where there should be yellow
… can’t work-out what happened there but I will try to fix it.
I discovered another "Spirograph" sim that allows drawing the path of points outside the rolling circle. Unfortunately it only allows you to draw the effect of a circle rolling round the inside of another, larger one, but a bit of mental straightening out of the containing circle gives you the idea.
The red trace is of a point on the circumference of the rolling circle, so this is our familiar cycloid form. The blue trace is at half the radius of the rolling circle (R/2) – clearly not a cycloid. The two green traces are of a point at 2*R and 3*R – as shown in Michael's image above you get the "curlicues" added where the trace loops back on itself – again, clearly not cycloids. It is quite an amusing toy – https://seedcode.com/SpirographN/sgn.html
Here's Michael's curves generated by calculation in spreadsheet. Can't work out how to superimpose them, but they show the same behaviour. If you're wondering why, well there's nowt on the telly, it's a bit late to go in the workshop and SWMBO is on the phone to her brother.
I think if this morphs into an Excel tutorial we might get complaints. Very briefly, arrange the X values in one column, and the Y values in an adjacent column, with their row numbers aligned. Select these 2 blocks of values using mouse, then from toolbar at the top insert/chart/X-Y scatter/points only/smooth. To have more than one set of y values, just select more data. It wants to use the left hand data as X you might be able to change that, but not sure how.
It gives you options to add labels to the whole chart and the axes and other clever things. I've got an old book about Excel upstairs (and I mean old, but it hasn't altered much). I could lend it to you if you like, PM me your dirt mail address.
Two things to add to Duncan's excellent description.
If you want to plot two Y variables against one X, put them in adjacent columns to the right. You can add column titles (say "time, amplitude, period" at the top of each column and select the titles as you select the columns.
If you choose the line option in the insert/… command it will plot a line through your points.
I think if this morphs into an Excel tutorial we might get complaints. Very briefly, arrange the X values in one column, and the Y values in an adjacent column, with their row numbers aligned. Select these 2 blocks of values using mouse, then from toolbar at the top insert/chart/X-Y scatter/points only/smooth. To have more than one set of y values, just select more data. It wants to use the left hand data as X you might be able to change that, but not sure how.
It gives you options to add labels to the whole chart and the axes and other clever things. I've got an old book about Excel upstairs (and I mean old, but it hasn't altered much). I could lend it to you if you like, PM me your dirt mail address.
.
Thanks for the offer, Duncan … much appreciated
I am, however, currently sinking in the quicksand whilst trying to rework some survey drawings in preparation for a planning application, and wouldn’t have time to study it this side of Christmas !!
With your notes and John’s I am already pointed in the right general direction thanks …
All I would ask for now is could you please let me have a copy of your file ?
I am likely to try it in Apple’s ‘Numbers’ which, although it has its own idiosyncratic style will happily open .xls
… I will send you a P.M.
MichaelG.
Author
Posts
Viewing 19 posts - 1 through 19 (of 19 total)
Please log in to reply to this topic. Registering is free and easy using the links on the menu at the top of this page.