Posted by Martin Connelly on 17/09/2023 08:05:44:
Classics scholars are the ones who tried to insist you should not split infinitives and so tried to apply this Latin rule to English.
That's not really the case, Martin; the people who insisted on it were really just linguistic prescriptivists – a species that is clearly very much alive and kicking today, on this forum and elsewhere.
In any case, any classical scholar worth his or her salt would know that the periphrastic tenses of the infinitive in Latin, of which there are several, consist of two parts that are regularly split by classical Latin writers, as they are by Latin writers of all periods. Other tenses of the infinitive in Latin are just one word, which you can't split whether you want to or not. How we form and use the infinitive in English is completely different. It's not unreasonable to say English doesn't even have an infinitive as such.
The only sane viewpoint really is to say that how one language happens to work is no basis for saying how another language should work.
Posted by SillyOldDuffer on 17/09/2023 10:41:48:
I would like to humbly point out that the plural of radius is radii…Let me put a spoke in the wheel! As Archimedes was Greek, and didn't speak Latin, it's obvious the right word must be Ακτίνες. Pity I can't pronounce it.
You got the Greek almost right, Dave: the accent is in the right place but you should have used a circumflex, not an acute.
Posted by JasonB on 17/09/2023 06:59:36:
I'm happy with either and know what is meant, maybe it's because I'm a bit common and never went to a posh school where Latin was a subject
I personally know several people, Jason, in different parts of the world who didn't go to a posh school or study Latin there, but who have managed to become highly accomplished Latinists. They are autodidacts, essentially.
I suspect you are an autodidact too in large part when it comes to engineering and IT-related matters.