Help needed with tiny numbers! – Sorted Thanks!

Advert

Help needed with tiny numbers! – Sorted Thanks!

Home Forums Model Engineer & Workshop Help needed with tiny numbers! – Sorted Thanks!

Viewing 7 posts - 1 through 7 (of 7 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #492738
    Neil Wyatt
    Moderator
      @neilwyatt

      I am struggling with reading the numbers on Item 7, page 39 of MEW issue 64.

      I suspect they are very tiny even on the original and haven't scanned well for the archive.

      I'm struggling to find my paper copy of issue 64 so can anyone send me a good scan of Item 7 please?

      Many thanks,

      Neil

      neil.wyatt@mytimemedia.com

      Advert
      #38578
      Neil Wyatt
      Moderator
        @neilwyatt
        #492740
        peak4
        Participant
          @peak4

          What format do you want Neil, pdf or jpg?

          Bill

          #492748
          Neil Wyatt
          Moderator
            @neilwyatt

            Hi Bill,

            Either would be great, as long as I can read hose pesky little numbers!

            Thanks, at least one reader will be very grateful!

            Neil

            #492751
            peak4
            Participant
              @peak4

              Neil, Check your mail, there should be something on its way.
              There is one particular number that's a problem, but let me know how you get on.

              Bill

              #492758
              EdH
              Participant
                @edh

                If it's the dimensions for the diameter of the formers then they are all 0.187 different to each other so start with the largest at 1.500 and work downwards. I suspect the problem is with the 0.938 on the lower right hand side as the print has a mark across the 9 of 0.938.

                #492767
                Neil Wyatt
                Moderator
                  @neilwyatt

                  Thanks Folks,

                  I'm sorted now, many thanks to Bill and Keith.

                  It was mostly the former diameters, but none of them were legible at all, also the 0.938 isn't very clear even on a good scan.

                  At least one reader is going to be very grateful, and I#'m glad my time retyping the article hasn't been wasted!

                  Neil

                Viewing 7 posts - 1 through 7 (of 7 total)
                • Please log in to reply to this topic. Registering is free and easy using the links on the menu at the top of this page.

                Advert

                Latest Replies

                Viewing 25 topics - 1 through 25 (of 25 total)
                Viewing 25 topics - 1 through 25 (of 25 total)

                View full reply list.

                Advert

                Newsletter Sign-up