.

There is a big hint in the thread title

See here if you are not a subscriber to MEW

**LINK**

https://www.magzter.com/article/Hobbies-Craft/Model-Engineers-Workshop/The-Modular-Dividing-Head

MichaelG.

Are you seeing MEW 289 now Jason, I,m not..?

Ron, I have other ways to see the digital MEW, though if you have a digital sub you should be OK to look at it on Pocketmags

Looks like it may have been on A3 or even larger and has been reduced down too much to fit half a magazine page.

Edited By JasonB on 29/12/2019 10:09:32

Agree with the comments re the tiny and virtually unreadable diagrams. I didn't get to read the whole article until receiving the March edition.

Having got Issue 290 page 36 I found tables 2 and 3 difficult to understand, can I presume it is showing the difference between a gear and a rack? The text doesn't mention either table. Then on page 37 another table 2 crops up where it says Depth of tooth and flats (in inches) then lists width of flats and depth of tooth in inches which are I believe ridiculous figures. Can I presume the decimal place is incorrect for most of the items listed. Then surprise surprise the same table appears as Table 4 in slightly larger print with exactly the same ( I believe) errors.

I am still plodding through the whole article.

Having said all that it does look like a useful workshop item.

Dave

David this has been covered in another thread as I spotted the table errors, though not the size error.

Don't think we can even presume the figures have the decimal point in the wrong place as depth looks wrong for the 1MOD though they ar eclose metric sizes except the first 16DP one which looks to be imperial . Even the trig for feeding in at an angle look to be wrong.

I have let Neil Know

Ed

Edited By JasonB on 21/02/2020 08:03:21

I've not really read it but that sounds logical.

Looking again at the table 4, I think the dimension for the 16DP width of flat is in decimal inches and the rest in metric though I don't agree with the metric figures which seem a little bit out.

Anyone else want to have a stab at the figures, they relate to cutting a worm gear so you have included angle, width of flat at end of tool, length of tool (Depth of cut?) and infeed with angled topslide. red is what I think it should be in relation to inch/mm

I'm sorry about these errors. I'm afraid this was a long article split over dozens of files and several issues and in the end the complexity of getting it all organised got the better of me.

This has been compounded by the separated and enlarged figures for the worm module not getting to us in time for issue 291, so we had to drop in another article to fill the space and these should appear in issue 292.

Hopefully 292 will see the article completed properly.

Neil