I think the last time it came up was on one of Stew's Potty engines. The spacing of the text was so large that the parts for this small engine took up about 3 pages, not helped by some errors that crept in along the way. Now just think how many pages would need to be given over to a loco or traction engine.
Myself I would rather see the build article than an endless list of parts & fixings.
Why not do what I do, sit down with the drawings and go through them and list out whats needed, this also helps you get a feel for the model and gives a better understanding of how it all goes together and spot any errors.
If you wish put it all into a simple spreadsheet, print it off and then go down into the workshop to see what you have or what can be used. For example one part may need 7/16 dia stock, if you just go by a supplied list and buy all thats missing it will cost you but if you have enough 1/2" in stock that will do the job.
Maybe if contributors produce a parts list it could be put on the web site rather than in the mag?
J
Edit, yes it was the overcrank that had 2.5pages of parts but the list only gave what the material should be but not sizes. And on the 3-cylinder radial a similar list was published on one page in quite large format, then on the opposite page the same list was produced as part of the drawings, now that is a waste of mag space.
Edited By JasonB on 08/06/2012 08:30:57