Clearly, Ed’s intention is to erect his bird feeder on a pole.
The need to measure and therefore determine whether thread pitch, profile, and diameters, conform with a particular (engineering) standard is understandable. It offers a simple solution to the perceived home workshop limitations and available tools. Howard’s point too is also valid as far as ‘design economy’ is concerned.
This however, is where things come unstuck and why I couldn’t resist a bit of superficial nit-picking. After all it’s ‘only’ plastic not an exotic material, so who cares?
Well, after years in TS often analysing a plethora of design-related product failures, I do for one!
Fully respecting Ed’s plastic ‘bird-feeder-on-a-pole’ issue, my comments are more a message for readers led into the impression that engineering standards are equally applicable to plastics. That is not necessarily true!
Choosing an off-the-shelf mechanical engineering standard can invite failure. Thus we see yet another product assigned into the bl***y plastic category.
While looking up suitable thread standards for plastics materials, and especially responding to Neil’s suggestion, take a squiz at this one.
DIN 6063-1 – Threads, mainly for plastic containers – Part 1: Buttress threads, dimensions.
**LINK**
At least that’ll be a start.
Good luck to all who sail in her.
Sam ![smile d smile d]()