Posted by John MC on 06/08/2018 17:53:07:
OP, are you sure the fit is not the usual Veloce slow taper? Many years ago I repaired a Mk1 KSS crank that had suffered they same as yours. Straight forward turning job, all the diameters can be turned at the same setting ensuring concentricity. What I had to do was bore the holes in the flywheels, both damaged. I bored them just enough to remove the damage and counterbored to take a "head" left on the inner ends of the shafts to stop them pulling through the flywheels. this approach avoids the welding approach. If you do bore the mainshaft holes this must be done with great care, setting up off the crankpin hole, get this wrong and the crank will never true up on assembly.
I believe Alpha are not trading at the moment, hopefully to return soon.
I would disagree with the "aftermarket scene" for post war Velo's being huge. The main supplier is not getting any younger and would like to retire. Anno domini is making itself felt with four other specialists (repairers). Some other classic bike dealers sell the common stuff, the more specialist stuff will become hard to get unless someone picks up the reins, may be the owners club?
Its also been mentioned someone is making complete engines, not quite but I believe that is his ambition. The price will mean that very few will be able to buy these parts.
John
John, i was trying to convey the difference in aftermarket spares availability between early and late Velo’s. Maybe i didn’t word it very well. The MK1 KSS gets very little attention, even compared to the MK2, so the aftermarket scene for Viper and Venom parts is huge in comparison.
Yes i think you are correct about the slow taper. The mainshaft bearing is described as having a 1 thou to the inch taper, which is probably why i struggled to measure it from the old shafts. Incidentally that single bearing is £185 + vat
This got me thinking, if im going to the trouble of making new shafts in modern material, then why not modify them to try and improve location. Your solution of adding a head and counterbore had crossed my mind, however i did wonder if this might weaken the crank halves and should they too be remade in EN24t.
if i did go down this route, i wonder if the shafts could be made plain with no taper, just an interference fit and tig welded on the back side, then a more common bearing used, (which should hopefully be cheaper ).
I would be interested on your thoughts.