I’m no leccy, but as I see it:
Separate motors, individually controlled by the operator are no great problem for VFD operation. It is the control circuitry, two speed motor controls and the such-like that complicates things, I believe.
The advantage of individual VFDs is that each can be programmed separately. Rewiring the motors to delta, or changing individual, single speed motors to 230V three phase versions is a once-off cost. If dual voltage motors, the change-over is simply made at the motor connection terminals.
The other VFD alternative implementation is that of one large VFD – much larger than the sum of the motors – which will run any, or all, of the motors separately or at the same time. It’s often called a ‘plug and play’ installation. Normally, VFDs sized for individual motors should not be switched between VFD and the motor it drives, but if the VFD is sufficiently over-sized this is not a problem. The motors will only run just as if they were mains driven (no programming or individual protection programs)
The advantage of VFDs is that they waste very little power when not driving the motor(s).
Converters do waste power when switched on and not supplying power (rotary converters run a motor while energised) but can more easily produce the 415 volt output required for the more complex wiring of machines with inter-connected drives.
The choice is yours but clearly depends on the complexity of the machine/wiring. I would say say stay clear of the cheaper static converter suppliers. Take advice from the experts in the field – who will charge more but provide you with a reliable, working system.