Hello Les,
I can see the debate continuing for some time, I hope my second posting made my installation a little clearer.
Just to clarify any confusion I may have caused.
The arrangement here before change was completely conventional, the workshop supply cable is protected from excess current with a miniature 32 A circuit breaker; the whole board of the consumer unit is protected from earth leakage fault by a 30 mA residual current device. Earthing at the consumer unit is referenced back to a standard earth rod close by
The new arrangement differs only in the provision of a second 30mA residual current device supplying the workshop and garden circuit alone; that is now referenced back to the second earth rod separated from the other by about 70 feet. There is now no direct connection back to the earth as seen at the consumer unit.
When this new arrangement was tested with direct phase to earth faults in the workshop, we also took measurements of the tripping current for both live to earth and neutral to earth. I don't remember the individual values now but they were in the range of 28mA and 31mA, but as I said in posting 2, the house supply continued to work uninterupted on both these tests—exactly what I had been told and expected it to do.
I think Alex Collins has added useful insight to all this with his long cable runs and the induced votlages that can build up accordingly, earthing to the planets surface will have variability from water content alone and cannot therefore be at equal potential at all points. Each point of earthing is still however equally valid as a reference point from which to measure current loss. As Phil Whitley has observed, I think I am fortunate to have a sparkie who knows his stuff.
Brian
Edited By Brian Wood on 17/09/2015 09:45:31