Not wanting to throw water on the bonfire, but with those dimensions, you may struggle to achieve decent tooth definition on the larger gear if 3D printed.
With a diameter of 34mm, that means a circumference of about 106.8mm and tooth tip to tip distance of about 1.55mm.
With a typical extruder diameter of 0.4mm and the fact that you will struggle to achieve a crest or valley that is not severely rounded at that resolution, I have my doubts as to how useable the print will be.
The 8 or 9 tooth part stands more chance of success as the teeth are much more defined.
I have printed several gt2 gears/pulleys that have 2mm tip to tip spacing, anything under 20 teeth was unuseable as the tooth definition was little more than a surface ripple and even with 75% of the teeth being wrapped by a belt, it still slipped. Pulleys of 40 or more teeth were useable, but only because of the high number of teeth being engaged by the belt – your application will be in a gear train, where only a few teeth will be engaged.
With the original being injection molded, a replacement may be better being cast from epoxy/resin after making the two halves out of some other material and making a mold with them.
Begs the question – how much is the replacement part vs cost of materials and time to produce a suitable replacement? Yes, 3D printing the part will be cheap, probably pennies in material costs, but will the printed part actually be useable?
You stand a better chance of 3D printing if someone has a powder based printer as this will achieve the required definition on the teeth, but I would then worry about the strength of the individual teeth.
Edited By Zebethyal on 15/12/2016 09:01:39