First Model complete – where next?

Advert

New Replies

Report Bug

Help/FAQs

First Model complete – where next?

This topic has 20 replies, 14 voices, and was last updated 18 December 2016 at 20:47 by mechman48.

Viewing 21 posts - 1 through 21 (of 21 total)

Author

Posts
1 July 2016 at 21:31 #245029
Stuart Bridger
Participant
@stuartbridger82290
I have finally completed my first model, a humble Stuart 10V. While not up to competition standard, I think I have done a pretty decent job. It runs nicely on air and the finish came up well. The wife has even allowed it to take pride of pIace on the mantelpiece. I have learned and re-learned a lot during this first foray into model engineering. It wasn't without challenges and there were a few components scrapped along the way.

The big question is what to tackle next? I think I would like to stick to stationary steam, but would like something that will challenge me further. Any suggestions on suitable kits or even plans from scratch for a next project? I have a reasonable capacity with a Chipmaster and a Warco VMC, so could tackle something with a larger flywheel.

Incidentlayy the base was cut from a low cost beech chopping board from a supermarket finished witha gunstock oil.
Advert

1 July 2016 at 21:31 #31137
Stuart Bridger
Participant
@stuartbridger82290
1 July 2016 at 22:01 #245033
roy entwistle
Participant
@royentwistle24699
Very nice but can I ask why did you use slotted round head screws instead of screws from underneath with nuts on top to fasten it to the base ?

Roy

Edited By roy entwistle on 01/07/2016 22:02:02
1 July 2016 at 22:03 #245034
Martin Cottrell
Participant
@martincottrell21329
That looks an extremely well executed first attempt Stuart! As for your next engine, how about staying with ST and trying one of their larger engines, perhaps a Victoria, a James Combes engine or perhaps one of their beam engines?

Regards Martin.
1 July 2016 at 22:06 #245035
Stuart Bridger
Participant
@stuartbridger82290
Posted by roy entwistle on 01/07/2016 22:01:13:

Very nice but can I ask why did you use slotted round head screws instead of screws from underneath with nuts on top to fasten it to the base ?

Roy

Edited By roy entwistle on 01/07/2016 22:02:02

Roy, to be honest, it was lack of plain steel nuts and making use of what I had to hand.
1 July 2016 at 22:09 #245036
Stuart Bridger
Participant
@stuartbridger82290
Posted by Martin Cottrell on 01/07/2016 22:03:06:

That looks an extremely well executed first attempt Stuart! As for your next engine, how about staying with ST and trying one of their larger engines, perhaps a Victoria, a James Combes engine or perhaps one of their beam engines?

Regards Martin.

Thanks Martin, I had been looking at The James Coombes
1 July 2016 at 22:26 #245040
NJH
Participant
@njh
There are a couple of build threads of the James Coombes on this forum. (Just search for James Coombes) If you want just a bit bigger than the 10 you could try the No 7 .

Many years ago I built the "Real" which uses the same sized bits as the James Coombs" It sits happily on my desk!

I always liked Stuart kits and the Victoria is certainly a nice model .

Let us know how you decide!

Regards

Norman

Edited By NJH on 01/07/2016 22:34:48
2 July 2016 at 03:27 #245060
Peter Krogh
Participant
@peterkrogh76576
Very good looking engine. Clean and sweet!

Pete
2 July 2016 at 08:59 #245072
Paul Lousick
Participant
@paullousick59116
Stuart, A nice looking engine.

For the next project, how about a small boiler to go with it so it can be powered by steam.

Paul
2 July 2016 at 10:59 #245092
Ian S C
Participant
@iansc
The ST S9 mill engine is a nice model, the governor is an interesting feature, I don't know if the current batch have a feed pump for a boiler, the older ones did. Ian S C
2 July 2016 at 11:09 #245094
Nick_G
Participant
@nick_g
Posted by Martin Cottrell on 01/07/2016 22:03:06:

perhaps a Victoria, a James Combes engine or perhaps one of their beam engines?

Regards Martin.

.

I found the James Coombes an interesting engine to construct. Also nice to look at (I think) with lots going on when running.

It's a reasonable size and there are many different machining type processes required. Reasonably small parts for the timing links to larger components. Taper turning to bar end rounding. It can be made as simple or as ornate as the builder would like.

The most difficult part (yet the most satisfying) was the 'Y' shaped conrod. It's important that it's true and not twisted for the engine to run properly and also looks cosmetically sweet as it's the main visual part of the engine.

I also did a build thread :- **LINK**

Regards, Nick
2 July 2016 at 11:27 #245098
Stuart Bridger
Participant
@stuartbridger82290
Posted by Nick_G on 02/07/2016 11:09:33:

Posted by Martin Cottrell on 01/07/2016 22:03:06:

perhaps a Victoria, a James Combes engine or perhaps one of their beam engines?

Regards Martin.

.

I found the James Coombes an interesting engine to construct. Also nice to look at (I think) with lots going on when running.

It's a reasonable size and there are many different machining type processes required. Reasonably small parts for the timing links to larger components. Taper turning to bar end rounding. It can be made as simple or as ornate as the builder would like.

The most difficult part (yet the most satisfying) was the 'Y' shaped conrod. It's important that it's true and not twisted for the engine to run properly and also looks cosmetically sweet as it's the main visual part of the engine.

I also did a build thread :- **LINK**

Regards, Nick

Thanks Nick, I watched your video of the completed model a couple of hours ago. Nice work! James Coombe is looking a very attractive proposition.
2 July 2016 at 15:06 #245132
JasonB
Moderator
@jasonb
A good first engine.

As well as the sual Stuart offering there are one or two engines from Reeves that are not too tricky as a second engine, Bruce engineering have a good range of Anthony Mount's designs but they can be quite small on some of teh parts so probably better as a third/forth subject. TS over in Germany have some similar designs to Stuart as well as a few other interesting subject so worth thinking about too.
2 July 2016 at 21:07 #245179
Metatsteam1
Participant
@metatsteam1
Hi Suart

I would be very pleased with a first attempt that looked as good as that. Can I recommend a website you may find useful when looking for a new project:- http://www.John-Tom.com. All models can be built with stock materials even the flywheel, although a stuart No10 flywheel improves all the models. I have built the version of STs Jamies Coombs from this site and also a version to the Stuart real engine but I doubled the size which created as very impressive model. Good luck with future builds.

Mat
3 July 2016 at 19:11 #245299
mechman48
Participant
@mechman48
Hi Stuart

Nice job on your S10V. I'm on my way to completing the S10V as you have; I have the S50 in waiting, followed by the Stuart Progress so with the amount of time I get in my man cave I have enough to see the rest of this year out, plus I have numerous plans in my library to see me out so not worried on that score.

George.
3 July 2016 at 19:28 #245303
Neil Wyatt
Moderator
@neilwyatt
Very pretty Stuart, nice base too.

Neil
18 December 2016 at 07:36 #272487
JasonB
Moderator
@jasonb
Last post moved to this new thread
18 December 2016 at 09:18 #272494
Speedy Builder5
Participant
@speedybuilder5
How about a nice vertical boiler – different skills and tools but would complete the engine, after that, a dynamo or small circular saw ??
BobH
18 December 2016 at 10:38 #272505
MW
Participant
@mw27036
You could try Tubal Cain's simple steam engine books, it's all old measurement but coming from the age of metric myself I can make do.

Michael W
18 December 2016 at 12:21 #272518
mechman48
Participant
@mechman48
Like you I have completed my S10V & now on with the 'progress' horizontal kit. ON my S10V I have replaced the valve chest cover with a Perspex sheet instead of using the cast cover, just so people can see the valve system operating…

Hmm I can't seem to resize pic now, before I could click on pic , it would turn blue and with edit points on the edges, I could then pick up one of the edit points & resize to a more convenient size, anyone know what's happened? It seem that this forums formatting seems to change willy nilly… the original pic was resized to 600 x 480 by Fastone resizer & have never had bother with any of my other pics?

Hmm seem to have got it sorted… have to right click pic & go through 'edit image' & change height & width in drop down box… Ahhh modern technology, does what IT wants to & not what YOU want it to, when everything worked fine before.

Progress so far on my next model… 'Progress' horizontal… with some de-flashing & initial machining done…

A chilled iron section of the base…

machining the recess on the cylinder port face…

Partial assembly to check fit & operation…

There are more pics in my album… Stuart OH…

George.

Edited By mechman48 on 18/12/2016 12:25:07

Edited By mechman48 on 18/12/2016 12:38:24
18 December 2016 at 20:47 #272631
mechman48
Participant
@mechman48
Got the pic issue sorted …I think. as I am more or less forced to use MS 'edge' now as my browser, I tried opening up in IE & managed to open the MEW forum in IE, attempted to manipulate the pics… lo & behold I was back to the editing points on the pic, so I picked the bottom corner point & found I could shrink / enlarge pic as previously. It seems as though IE & edge have different methods of editing pics on this forum, don't ask me why, I haven't got a flippin' clue, maybe some one with more tech savvy understanding could explain…?

George.
Author

Posts