The mis-conception round bar is round

Advert

New Replies

Report Bug

Help/FAQs

The mis-conception round bar is round

This topic has 16 replies, 9 voices, and was last updated 16 March 2011 at 20:18 by Anonymous.

Viewing 17 posts - 1 through 17 (of 17 total)

Author

Posts
14 March 2011 at 15:46 #30322
Former Member
Participant
@formermember43226
Advert

14 March 2011 at 19:09 #65488
Anonymous
To pick up on a post I made earlier in the thread on ‘Travelling Steady’, I’ve dug out the material that has a helical finish on it:

Rather stupidly I’ve stamped it only with ‘SS’, so I don’t know exactly what grade of stainless steel. However I suspect it would be 303, as that is the grade I normally buy for general turning. Interestingly the pitch of the helix is quite fine. It is the only material on which I’ve seen such a finish.

Measurements around the circumference show a maximum variation in diameter of 0.02mm, a bit under 1 thou in old money.

Regards,

Andrew
14 March 2011 at 19:35 #65491
JasonB
Moderator
@jasonb
I’ve had the coarser pitch like Graham’s on some MS bar. As I wanted it for a traction engine back axle I had to resign it to the stock pile and source the bar elsewhere.

J
14 March 2011 at 21:47 #65504
mgj
Participant
@mgj
Having had a look at all my stock, its only the bigger stuff that has the helix.

Pure guess but there probably comes a point where direct drawing through a die becomes uneconomic or needs an awful lot of horsepower, and they use a roller to form?

Andrew’s stainless look a bit lumpier than one would expect?
14 March 2011 at 22:02 #65507
Terryd
Participant
@terryd72465
See my comment on the travelling steady thread. This is quite unnecessary really.

No one questioned whether your bar was round, hexagonal or green with pink spots. It was simply a question of you describing it as rolled in one sentence and drawn in the next.. I was trying to give you a way of explaining why for anyone who may have been confused. Please re-read the original post I made.

Yet another example of folks hearing what they want to hear not what is actually said.

Graham, What is the difference in diameter over the helix as compared to the diameter of the bar? and what would be the effect on a 1 1/16 dia thread?

Edited By Terryd on 14/03/2011 22:29:41
14 March 2011 at 22:25 #65510
Ramon Wilson
Participant
@ramonwilson3
Hi guy’s,

When Graham first mentioned this characteristic it rung a bell as I was sure I had seen it before on material used at work. I was not sure however this would be on all ‘Cold Drawn Steel’ as I could not remember ever having a problem with basic Bright bar. I can’t recall being bothered by it at home either.

That is not to say it’s roundness and dimensional tolerance can be taken as gospel – if you want that then you have to go to PGMS – but merely that it’s much better suited to popping straight in a three jaw than ever black ‘Hot Rolled Bar’ is.

Looking at Andrews image this is exactly what I can remember so have been out to the workshop tonight and had a real good ‘root’ in the metal stock to see if I could find something similar.

About six weeks ago I purchased from my last company several lengths of En1a in varying diameters. Taking a close look at them there is no real indication of this helical characteristic. To me they look as I expected for ‘Cold Drawn’ . Going through the ‘stash’ however, I find that it is reasonably pronounced on some pieces of EN8 and EN34. What stainless I have though shows none.

My recollection (and that is becoming a struggle these days) is that this was most prevalent on bars of ‘tougher’ steels. For example we used to order B01 Arne tool steel both in black and bright finish and I’m sure that this (the bright) was where this helix was most prominent almost as if it had been ‘coarsely’ ground though that’s not implying that it was!

Macreadys handbook gives a good description of the proccesses – I see Graham they denote ‘Cold Rolled’ as an incorrect term but that may, as you say, be an Americanism.

Some time back I was given some EN24T offcuts by an ex work colleague whose entire works is CNC out put. All the EN24T that I had used todate had been as I would have described as cold drawn but this had a very bright – almost highly polished finish. I haven’t examined it close enough to say whether it is ground or turned but it is extremely smooth. When I asked about this I was told that the material came in as such for use in the automatic barfeeders.

Could it be then that the ‘helical marked’ material is as described in Macreadys as Centreless Turned as opposed to cold drawn? possibly with this kind of operation in mind. I don’t ever recall specifically asking for it as opposed to black, bright or PGMS

Whatever I certainly concur with Graham et al that as supplied none of it is really suitable for use for other than the most basic of shafting if it has to go in any kind of a bearing.

As said however PGMS is very close toleranced and is a pleasure to machine – of which, regretably, my ‘stash’ contains such a limited (very) supply

This is the blurb from Macreadys 1990 sixth edition

Regards – Ramon
14 March 2011 at 22:31 #65512
Terryd
Participant
@terryd72465
Hi Andrew ,

was your purchase from stock or from offcuts? Could it have been previously part of a bar used for other purposes?

Hi Ramon,

non of my bright drawn up to 90mm dia shows this helical pattern but I have seen it before.

Best Regards

Terry

Edited By Terryd on 14/03/2011 22:34:39
14 March 2011 at 23:21 #65516
Anonymous
Ok, to pick up on some points. I’ve dug out the original invoice for the stainless steel. Turns out it is grade 1.4307, ie, 304L. It certainly isn’t ‘coppery’ in appearance, more kitchen sink! I’ll have to stamp 304L on it tomorrow evening before I put it back on the rack.

It definitely isn’t an offcut; I bought the standard 3m length from Parkersteel, based in Canterbury, but they have a big warehouse near Cambridge. Probably a bit late to complain now if it isn’t up to scratch, as I bought it in 2008. I’ve got two 1m lengths on the rack, so I must have used the other 1m. I haven’t got any recollection of what I made with it though.

While having a bit of a re-arrangement in the kitchen this evening to move the boilers for my traction engines I noticed, for the first time, that the material I’ve used for the rear axles has a very faint helix, just like Grahams picture. Any out of roundness is better than 0.01mm though, ie, I can’t for certain detect it with an ordinary 25-50mm micrometer. Strangely, in view of Ramon’s comment, the axle material is EN8.

Regards,

Andrew

Edited By Andrew Johnston on 14/03/2011 23:21:38
15 March 2011 at 05:43 #65528
John Olsen
Participant
@johnolsen79199
I beleive the product shown is what is referred to as peeled bar See here It is smoother than black bar but not as smooth as drawn bar or ground bar.

regards

John
15 March 2011 at 09:58 #65539
Ramon Wilson
Participant
@ramonwilson3
Hi John, How’s tricks?

Peeled Bar – You see, I said recall is a struggle at times. I do believe that was the term used by Uddeholm’s for ‘bright’ as opposed to ‘black’ finish tool steel. Most of our tool steel though not all came from them and it’s a term I do remember.

Looking at the Macreadys text again (BTW sorry about the poor reproduction – I can scan it again if needs be) and their comments on machinability of Cold Drawn compared with Hot Rolled.

Their description of Centreless Turning of hot rolled bar and subsquent final polishing through rotating rollers clearly states a high surface finish to close tolerances.

Looks like you have chosen wisely Andrew

Could it be that most material is now finished in this way as opposed to basic ‘Cold Drawn’ Everything has moved on so much since my last foot in a machine shop perhaps this is now the norm.

Regards – Ramon
15 March 2011 at 21:37 #65581
Anonymous
Graham,

Seems to me that it was a perfectly reasonable thing to do; starting another thread to discuss an interesting topic that nevertheless had deviated from the subject in the original post. That way the new topic should get more exposure.

Damn it, I’m seeing spirals everywhere now! I had to move a 1m length of 1/2″ silver steel this evening to get to my small stuff stock rack, and blow me down it’s got spirals on it. Quite unlike the normal uniform slightly dull finish on silver steel. Funnily enough this particular length has been rejected by me, as it is consistently 0.0007″ undersize. It was bought from a professional source (J&L), but as they’d already boo-boo’d over the order I couldn’t be bothered to sort this out as well. I bought some 13″ lengths of 1/2″ silver steel from a different supplier and it’s bang on size, as best I can tell.

Regards,

Andrew

PS: If anybody wants a 1m length of nominally 1/2″ silver steel PM me and you can have it, if you collect it, otherwise it’ll get recycled next time I go to the council tip.
15 March 2011 at 21:37 #65582
mgj
Participant
@mgj
Build locos or traction engines – then it goes round slowly enough you don’t have to worry.

Not quite true if you want three axles to rotate freely and the total tolerance is the reaming allowance within one bearing…but then one will always bounce it about on the track.

Like Gray and Andrew BTW I have spirals on bars of about 1″ and bigger.

Edited By mgj on 15/03/2011 21:39:21
16 March 2011 at 07:57 #65599
PekkaNF
Participant
@pekkanf
Posted by Andrew Johnston on 15/03/2011 21:37:34:

PS: If anybody wants a 1m length of nominally 1/2″ silver steel PM me and you can have it, if you collect it, otherwise it’ll get recycled next time I go to the council tip.

I like 1/2″ althoug I try not to mess with imperial measurement. 1/2 is fairly easy to turn/grind to nominal 12 mm and close to required tolerance.

Just never have got round buying one, because it’s all metric here. I have turned some short pieces from 16 mm silver steel down to 12 mm.

PekkaNF
16 March 2011 at 11:03 #65608
Gordon W
Participant
@gordonw
What is all the fuss about? Marks on bars due to manufacturing methods, bars not round. Nothing is round ,or square . Measure a roller bearing with sufficient accuracy and it’s not round. Somebody throwing out steel because it’s a gnats thingy under some arbitrary size, wish I lived nearer. PS do any of those cartoon yellow heads have a tongue in cheek?
16 March 2011 at 11:36 #65610
Anonymous
Posted by Gordon W on 16/03/2011 11:03:30:

Somebody throwing out steel because it’s a gnats thingy under some arbitrary size, wish I lived nearer.

Each to his own; by its very nature silver steel is supposed to be a precision product, but this silver steel is well outside the normal tolerance. It should be better than +/-0.00025″. Assuming a Gaussian distribution any errors would probably normally be undectable in the home workshop, as was the case with the replacement silver steel.

If the manufacturers of this steel are prepared to take such a cavalier approach to size control what else is wrong, the composition may be?

Time is precious to me, and I’m not going to waste it working with inferior materials!

Regards,

Andrew
16 March 2011 at 17:03 #65622
Gordon W
Participant
@gordonw
Hi, by its very nature silver steel is supposed to be silver steel. the finished size does not effect that. Maybe you needed steel ground to a specific diameter? In that case you are quite right to send it back. If I’d known I would have paid the postage to here though.
16 March 2011 at 20:18 #65626
Anonymous
Surely silver steel is supposed to be ground to a specific diameter? Plus or minus a tolerance of course; the piece I have is well outside of that tolerance and thus no use to me.

GordonW: I still have piece. After a run in with J&L about a different issue with the same order I decided it was going to cost me more mucking about on the ‘phone for 15 minutes than the steel was worth. If you want it for cost of the postage PM me and I’ll work out the postage.

Regards,

Andrew
Author

Posts