Would I be right in assuming that only a few of the contributors to this thread have yet read the paper that was linked in the article ?
MichaelG.
.
Here’s a brief quote from the introduction:
Given these remarkable properties, why is Ga often overlooked aside from its use in semi-conductors (e.g., GaAs, GaN)? This situation can likely be attributed to several factors. Despite being relatively earth abundant, Ga costs ∼$0.25/g (2020 price) since it is produced by extracting Ga oxide as an impurity found in alumina. Plus, there is an overgeneralized historical association of liquid metals (LMs) with toxicity (e.g., the case of mercury). However, probably the most pragmatic explanation as to why Ga is not widely employed commercially is a result of its surface reactivity. A paper published in Science in 1954 stated: “Despite all precautions, this gallium electrode always behaved erratically” (11, p. 390). We now know that this “erratic” behavior is the result of the high reactivity of Ga with its environment. This reactivity most typically manifests itself in the formation of an ∼1–5-nm-thick native oxide that affects the surface chemistry, wetting, and rheology of Ga. Finally, Ga may get overlooked because it can diffuse into the grain boundaries of certain solid metals, such as Al, leading to significant degradation of mechanical properties.
… after which, the paper concentrates upon the exploitation of the mechanical properties of Gallium [which is why I thought it might be of interest here].
.
MichaelG.
Edited By Michael Gilligan on 08/05/2022 14:12:11