Jeff Dayman –
Sorry but you are very wide of the mark by merely slagging off an entire range of materials and their manufacturer. I have no connection with the Tufnol company but have encountered its products at work and studied its web-site before adding a comment above; so I know that SRBF and SRBP are not "substandard" at all. Adding the company name makes your assertion merely libellous.
Like the other plastics you mention, they have their individual natures that render them suitable for particular purposes but not others, so are made in a variety to cover that. It is up to the user to select accordingly, and if the component fails in service you need establish if that was by choosing the wrong material or by using the right material to a poor design – i.e. the user's not maker's fault.
The Tufnol range is not "obsolete", but is still manufactured so is obviously still in demand; and their main customers are professional engineers of whom many could well be using such materials in costly projects to high specifications. Using them like the acetals etc. and various metals, as right for the specific components in the specific applications.
'
Or perhaps we should not use copper, tin and bronze either: older than exotic stainless-steels and titanium alloys by several thousand years, so obviously "obsolete".