Posted by Phil P on 18/12/2019 08:39:54:
I get that you want the colour to be right for an old clock, but are you trying to pass off your newly made parts as being original to the clock ?
I would have thought it does not really matter if the parts are a slightly different colour, because they are obviously from recent restoration work and certainly not original, and as such will be part of its documented history.
If I were purchasing such a high value original item, I would not be too happy if i found out later someone had made most of it very recently.
Bearing in mind your comments about the value and rarity, are you trying to make the clock more saleable, or make it run better for years to come ?
Just curious.
Phil
Phil – what a good question, and one horologists can debate for hours on end!
My clock – a London made spring-driven clock by a recognised maker dating from 1710 – started off life with not only an hour strike, but also a quarter repeat mechanism (on the pull of a string) and an alarm. These clocks would originally have been carried around the house by a servant and placed next to the bed at night. In more recent times, such clocks ceased to be carried about and just sat on tables or mantlepieces and the quarter repeats and alarms fell out of use. Furthermore, the original verge escapements, which were so robust they could survive the moving about, also tended to get replaced with more accurate but more delicate anchor escapements. My clock, which I bought at a public auction, is missing its quarter repeat and alarm and has an anchor conversion.
Current feeling and practice amongst connoisseurs and restorers is that reconversion to verge and reinstatement of missing mechanisms is acceptable practice, as is trying to make the parts look authentic, including using the right colour brass (in fact not using the right brass is frowned upon). These clocks (mine included) don't just have ornate faces; the backplate and even some of the interior parts are ornately engraved, so its a bit like restoring a painting – all has to look right and blend in. I don't intend to sell the clock but in this internet age any knowlegable buyer would quickly be able to discover the auction catalogue listing and associated images of the clock in its unrestored state and deduce what had been done to it.
One thing I am being scrupulous about is making sure everything is reversible. This means using only the existing holes in the plates. Where these are threaded (and there were no standards in 1710), I will be making bespoke screws to fit. The only holes I will need to drill are where some original holes were plugged during the conversion to anchor. The main dilemma is to what extent should any remaining unused holes (mainly those drilled to fit the anchor mechanism) be plugged.