Posted by SteveI on 01/11/2017 14:55:54:
Hi,
Thanks to all for the responses. I am not worried about my method for setting the top slide, in that it is limited to the accuracy of my DRO, dial indicator and rigidity of my top slide which I can't do much about. My issue is being able to accurate move it in to place when those final tiny adjustments are needed. On reflection I think I am simply asking what is the best compromise for an ER collet.
As an exercise the best I can get it to is 7.9984° which I expect makes no difference, assuming perfect DRO and dial indicator. I've wasted 3 hours getting it that close. I had it at 8.0101° within 15 minutes owing to a bit of luck with the raw hide hammer on the cross slide. As per Bazyle's post my "guess" is that being under is better than being over. And in the act of getting just under I found my luck was used up for the day and it took 2.45 to get it as good again. And thanks to Jason for the bell mouth warning.
So for ER collets is being a tad under better than being over the 8° nominal?
Thanks,
Steve
That's sounds a completely pointless exercise I'm afraid.
Over 4" of cross slide the difference between 7.9984° and 8.0000° is +0.00013", little more than a tenth of a thou. Over the length of an ER collet you are talking a wavelength of light.
Forget any temperature variations in your workshop, how confident are you 'that your really straight bar' is aligned to a significantly greater accuracy than a tenth of a thou over its length? Or that the toolpost won't flex by at least that much?
Sorry if that seems harsh but with typical workshop measuring equipment and conditions it is simply impossible to work to such a level of accuracy by measurement.
If you want a good fit, work to a known good collet and you will achieve a better and more reliable fit than you are ever likely to get by measurement alone.