Advice re: holding workpiece to cut taper

Advert

New Replies

Report Bug

Help/FAQs

Advice re: holding workpiece to cut taper

This topic has 18 replies, 6 voices, and was last updated 9 October 2010 at 21:21 by John Coates.

Viewing 19 posts - 1 through 19 (of 19 total)

Author

Posts
27 September 2010 at 12:21 #15482
John Coates
Participant
@johncoates48577
It’s flexing and not cutting true
Advert

27 September 2010 at 12:21 #56160
John Coates
Participant
@johncoates48577
I am making a tap and die holder. Basically the holder(s) will slide along a shaft held by an MT3 taper in my tailstock

It might be that I have gone about things in the wrong order. The shaft workpiece started as 25mm dia bar and I cut the shaft onto one end (12mm dia and about 80mm long). I am now holding the shaft in the 3 jaw but even with a centre held in the tailstock there is noticeable flex when cutting the bar to clean up the rough surface before attempting the taper.

I can see the tailstock flex because the MT3 taper holding the centre is at full extent to clear the saddle and to give a good seat to the the centre into the workpiece

Do I need to start with a fresh piece of bar and do the taper first and then the shaft? Or try lighter cuts?

Don’t say use a 4 jaw as that is holding the die holder which has cut nicely and has a nice finish after practising my finishing cuts

Thanks for any help

John
27 September 2010 at 13:00 #56161
Anonymous
I think I’d have probably done it the other way round, ie, machine the taper first and then the shaft. Two reasons for doing this; one, if I bog up cutting the taper I haven’t lost a lot of other work. Second, assuming that if the lathe has MT3 in tailstock then the headstock must be at least MT3, the part can then be held in the headstock taper and be supported by the tailstock.

However, that’s not where we’re at. Even as described I don’t think the shaft should be flexing. I assume a reasonably robust lathe if it has a MT3 tailstock. So, something is not right. Could be the 3 jaw chuck is worn, the tailstock barrel might be worn if it is locked and still flexing. Not enough pressure on the tailstock centre? Is everything tight and locked?

Regards,

Andrew
27 September 2010 at 13:07 #56162
Keith Long
Participant
@keithlong89920
Hi John

How are you planning to get the taper – set over tail-stock or angled top-slide? If set over tail-stock the I’d do the job between centres with a very sharp tool and light cuts. Provided that you get the taper that you want – how you get there is of secondary importance. Doing the job between centres means that you can take it out of the lathe for checking against a sleeve and put it back without worry to carry on. If you’re having to hold the shaft in a chuck then trying to use the tail-stock offset method means you will be bending the workpiece and flexing it so you will see the tail-stock at full extension moving in all probability. If you are using the top-slide at an angle then I think it will be a case of again a very sharp tool and light cuts. At least if you leave the job in the chuck and just retract the tail-stock you should be able to check the taper against a sleeve if you have or can borrow one. I personally would not be happy with trying the taper in the tail-stock spindle as that would mean removing the centre to carry out the check with the possibility of it not seating exactly as it did before when you want to carry on.

Those are my thoughts – others with more experience may disagree or have other suggestions.

Keith

Edited By Keith Long on 27/09/2010 13:09:05

Edited By Keith Long on 27/09/2010 13:09:45
27 September 2010 at 13:23 #56163
John Coates
Participant
@johncoates48577
Andrew: – the headstock is MT4. How do I check for a worn chuck or tailstock? Yes everything was locked down but the lathe is from 1947 and I’m not sure if it isn’t worn. I got some good cuts on 60mm bar for the die holder using the 4 jaw without a centre in the tailstock

Keith:- I was planning to angle the topslide but I think clearance is going to be my big problem. The lathe does have a rotating headstock with degrees marked on the casting and base which is what the Barker is/was famous for so I can rotate the headstock to the angle for an MT3 (about 1.5 degrees I have read) and adjust the tailstock
27 September 2010 at 14:17 #56165
Keith Long
Participant
@keithlong89920
Hi John

I’m in the process of trying to align the head-stock bearings on my lathe, so I wouldn’t recommend anyone to “de-adjust” a lined up head-stock just to cut a taper, especially as you’ll be trying to set it to 1 degree, 26 minutes and 15 seconds – and the 15 seconds matters for a good fit!!

I think I’d still back my previous suggestion, keep the lathe and the tail-stock straight, angle the top-slide, if necessary make up a tool holder that will allow a reasonable overhang of the tool in the tool-post to open up clearance to use the top-slide. Make sure the tool is SHARP and use LIGHT cuts – you’re not in a race, and check the taper – OFTEN. By doing this you should be able to compensate for any movement in the tail stock barrel.

As an after thought can you rig any form of support at the back of the tail-stock barrel. A piece of timber wedged between it and something else solid should give that bit of extra support to reduce the flexing that you’re seeing.

Keith
27 September 2010 at 16:43 #56168
John Haine
Participant
@johnhaine32865
When I made one of these I used a commercial soft taper, bored out to accomodate a 1/2″ piece of silver steel which I loctited in place. Would make one by cutting a taper first, parting off, mounting in h/stock, and boring out.
27 September 2010 at 17:35 #56169
Bogstandard
Participant
@bogstandard
The first bit of this post shows how I cut a 5MT to fit into my lathe spindle, but you could use the same metthod for a smaller one. Forget about the grinding, use a good machining steel and you will be OK. In fact I wouldn’t even bother cutting a 3MT, just buy a blank nosed one for a few squid and work from that.

Turning 5MT

Bogs
27 September 2010 at 20:19 #56171
John Coates
Participant
@johncoates48577
Keith:- the tailstock seems to lock good and tight to the bed. Its the barrel fully extended that seems to exhibit the looseness. I shall have another play when I am allowed back into the garage by SWMBO

John & Bogs:- I did think about buying some pre-formed tapers but then thought that attempting the MT3 would be a good learning experience on my road from newbieness. This is my fall back position though if my skill is outrun by time i.e. the need to get cutting some threads with the tap and die holder
27 September 2010 at 20:29 #56173
Anonymous
Hi John,

As a first step you don’t need anything fancy to check if the chuck jaws and tailstock are worn. For the chuck, put a longish bar in the chuck and tighten moderately. Then see if you can move the bar by pushing and pulling by hand. The most likely error is that the jaws no longer grip parallel. If this is case the outer end of the bar should move.

I assume that you have a Barker lathe, with the round bar bed? Interesting design concept. The tailstock looks a little short, so this may be where the play is. Wind the barrel out, apply clamps and see if you can move the barrel by pushing and pulling on the end. The most likely fault is some wear in the barrel housing, and this will be most apparent when the barrel is fully extended.

I wouldn’t even think about swivelling the headstock to turn a taper. Once it is set up to turn parallel, leave well alone. Apart from anything else, I don’t think it will be that easy to set. Much easier to move the topslide. It’s a right royal pain in the posterior adjusting a cylindrical grinder for Morse tapers, where it is relatively easy to adjust the table the odd thou at a time with a fine pitch screw. It’ll be more difficult on the headstock. According to my calculations 1 thou over 3″ gives an included angle of about 1 minute of arc. That’s the sort of accuracy you will need to achieve.

Best Regards,

Andrew
27 September 2010 at 20:30 #56174
Keith Long
Participant
@keithlong89920
Hi John

It was supporting the barrel that I had in mind – didn’t express it very well

Keith
27 September 2010 at 20:46 #56175
John Coates
Participant
@johncoates48577
Andrew:- how long for the longish bar? 12″?
27 September 2010 at 22:29 #56179
Anonymous
Hi John,

Yes, 12″ would be fine. It’s not critical, just long enough to get a good purchase on.

Regards,

Andrew
28 September 2010 at 01:52 #56182
John Olsen
Participant
@johnolsen79199
Hi Guys, May not be much help with this one, but I have found when turning tapers that it can pay to have the small end towards the headstock That way, when you angle the topslide, the handle end is getting further from the tailstock, not closer. On a Myford, clearance there can be a real problem. I would usually do a taper with the job held between centres so that it can be removed and replaced, which allows trying it in a suitable socket if one is about. (Hard to make a good fit if one isn’t) I hate offsetting the tailstock, and the headstock would be even worse.

If you set up a taper on the topslide using a dial guage against a known good taper, the dial guage must be exactly at centre height on the job.

regards

John
28 September 2010 at 07:48 #56193
John Coates
Participant
@johncoates48577
Andrew;- I put a piece of 31mm dia bar in the 3 jaw with enough length in the chuck to be covered by each jaw which left 225mm projecting. It was rock solid. Same with locking up the tailstock with the barrel fully extended.

But I did notice the tip of the centre is worn and the centre is not a true cone. It has effectively a nipple on the end.

So I’m putting it down to flex in the workpiece and the worn centre

Thanks for all the help and I’m going to follow Bogs’ method

Regards

John
28 September 2010 at 07:51 #56194
John Coates
Participant
@johncoates48577
Andrew;- I put a piece of 31mm dia bar in the 3 jaw with enough length in the chuck to be covered by each jaw which left 225mm projecting. It was rock solid. Same with locking up the tailstock with the barrel fully extended.

But I did notice the tip of the centre is worn and the centre is not a true cone. It has effectively a nipple on the end.

So I’m putting it down to flex in the workpiece and the worn centre

Thanks for all the help and I’m going to follow Bogs’ method

Regards

John
28 September 2010 at 08:49 #56195
John Olsen
Participant
@johnolsen79199
You can true up a worn centre by using one of those little Dremel tools as a tool post die grinder. I did a half centre recently like that, except I used a little (5/8″ Diameter) air die grinder, which works even better than the Dremel ones. The centre goes in the headstock and you set the topslide to the correct angle.

Of course some do not like to grind in the lathe, if you do you should cover everything possible and clean up well afterwards.

regards

John
28 September 2010 at 11:26 #56205
Anonymous
Hi John,

Sounds like the chuck and tailstock are in reasonable condition. A poor finish on the centre would certainly cause issues. Sounds like you have identified the cause of the problem.

Regards,

Andrew
9 October 2010 at 21:21 #56718
John Coates
Participant
@johncoates48577
Update on this

I used the adjustable headstock on my Barker to re-cut the centre and remove the “nipple” at the end. Measured the centre as 60 degrees so set the headstock over 30 degrees (its maximum anyway). Like this:

I then used this method to cut the MT3 taper for the die holder. Set the headstock to approx 1.5 degrees and cut it in no time. Didn’t blue it up and test it in the MT3 socket (will do that later) but just swapped the MT3-MT4 adapter, put the new taper in and cut the end down to 12mm as the shaft for the die holder

Quite impressed by the Barker in this respect. It made taper cutting less of a daunting prospect. As with all my newbie work at the moment, its not pretty but its functional and will get me started tapping and cutting straighter threads !

John
Author

Posts