Diacator made by Dietest

Advert

New Replies

Report Bug

Help/FAQs

Diacator made by Dietest

This topic has 21 replies, 12 voices, and was last updated 20 August 2023 at 23:00 by Michael Gilligan.

Viewing 22 posts - 1 through 22 (of 22 total)

Author

Posts
19 August 2023 at 19:26 #657153
Chris Mate
Participant
@chrismate31303
Hi,

Does anybody here owns or used a Diacator made by Dietest for centering a hole below your mill spindle, similar function to the coaxial centering indicators-?
Advert

19 August 2023 at 19:26 #11558
Chris Mate
Participant
@chrismate31303
For centering your mill
19 August 2023 at 21:59 #657165
bernard towers
Participant
@bernardtowers37738
Surely it’s a coaxial indicator by another name?
20 August 2023 at 07:30 #657176
DiogenesII
Participant
@diogenesii
Looks like a good instrument – how much is it?

If I had a choice between buying a co-ax indicator or a DRO, I'd buy a DRO.

If you have a DRO you probably don't need a co-ax indicator.
20 August 2023 at 08:04 #657178
Michael Gilligan
Participant
@michaelgilligan61133
I don’t … but Niels does [or did] :

.

.

MichaelG.
20 August 2023 at 09:04 #657186
Nigel Graham 2
Participant
@nigelgraham2
Diogenes…

I must be missing something here how do you use a DRO to set a work-piece to the centre of an existing hole without something between it and the rim of the hole?

You still need some type of edge-indicator, whether you use a DRO or the handwheel dials.
20 August 2023 at 09:21 #657192
Robert Atkinson 2
Participant
@robertatkinson2
The lever below the DTI translates sideways movement of the probe into vertical and pointer deflection.
The clever bit is allowing the dial to remain stationary.

Robert
20 August 2023 at 09:24 #657193
Robert Atkinson 2
Participant
@robertatkinson2
Looks like I was right. Google is your friend:

Diacator

Robert.

Edited By Robert Atkinson 2 on 20/08/2023 09:27:18
20 August 2023 at 09:28 #657195
Clive Foster
Participant
@clivefoster55965
Nigel

Simple way uses the DRO zero and half functions with a solid rod in teh chuck as an indicator.

Set up as best you can by eye.

Choose an axis.

Move until the rod just touches one side of the bore being centred.

Zero the axis.

Move until the other side just touches the rod.

Hit the hard setting button.

Move to zero which should be in the middle of that axis.

Repeat touch off process and zeroing on other axis.

Zero – zero should now be in the middle to within the error of your touch off process.

Repeat process to verify before starting work.

As touch off errors are opposite they tend to cancel out assuming your process is reliable. Generally feeling for drag as you rotate the spindle is good enough.

An advantage of co-axial indicators is that they will show up non circular bores. The DRO method only finds the centre relative to the testing lines.

Clive
20 August 2023 at 09:32 #657196
DC31k
Participant
@dc31k
A potential advantage of the co-ax indicator types used in a hole compared to a standard edge finder is that they will work at zero rpm. You can turn the spindle gently using one hand and see how the needle moves (even rotating it in discrete 90 degree increments if necessary). With an edge finder, it needs some powered rpm to see the wobble disappear and then observe the 'kick'.

With a co-ax indicator, finding centre is quite a smooth single operation. Poke in the hole and adjust until the needle does not move and zero everything. With an edge finder, there are four (maybe six) distinct actions that have to be coordinated with DRO button pressing.

Where a co-ax indicator might score is adjusting the height of a dividing head tailstock especially if you are setting it up to cut a taper.

Could we come up with something a co-ax can do that a standard indicator and a mirror cannot do?
20 August 2023 at 09:35 #657198
bernard towers
Participant
@bernardtowers37738
One of the big problems with a lot of commercial coax indicators is the amount of headroom required so if you have a small mill they can be impossible to use which is why I when the route of making my own. A nice satisfying project which gets used again and again.
20 August 2023 at 09:51 #657202
Brian G
Participant
@briang
I assume there must be something special to justify a price three times that of a Blake indicator and nearly twenty times that of generic ones? As it is used in the same way I cannot see it speeding up the operation enough to save much cost.

**LINK**

Brian G
20 August 2023 at 10:24 #657207
Michael Gilligan
Participant
@michaelgilligan61133
Posted by Brian G on 20/08/2023 09:51:41:

I assume there must be something special to justify a price three times that of a Blake indicator […]

.

Presumably a combination of ‘country of origin’ and claimed accuracy

’though I note that the certificate is unsigned !

MichaelG.

.
20 August 2023 at 11:17 #657214
Anonymous
Posted by Michael Gilligan on 20/08/2023 10:24:19:

Presumably a combination of ‘country of origin’ and claimed accuracy

’though I note that the certificate is unsigned !

I have a Haimer Centro:

Claimed accuracy is 2 microns not that I have any way of confirming that. The only problem is that (as Bernard says) it does need a fair amount of headroom.

Andrew
20 August 2023 at 16:34 #657231
Chris Mate
Participant
@chrismate31303
I am looking at the different types to get a better picture of all.

The other day I made a test cut with new boring head, I actually used the boring head/bar-Insert itself to centre the head above at 1st,… and then in the hole by listining to the boring bar tip as it go around, mill switched off, turn and adjust by hand, you don't want to break a bar or the head turning it on. It worked out after some effort.

These tools may not work out always:
I then realised there might be a situation, and thats a situation I might have to deal with if my current quick plan proves not to work out for restoring the RF 115 Rong Fu bandsaw which was dropping blades when I received it, a situation where indicating with a tool like this means not much if the bore has been weared out uneven.

So in a case like this, where you want a shaft to line up correctly from your boring and sleeving excersize, you must find a ring visible outside of the wear pattern(Hole) to indicate the original alignment and to the centre of your spindle. So in this case I will probably using the boring head and bar insert tip to get the job done right, time consuming but hopefully lined up correctly.

Note:It seems these tools has a very interesting point in design apart from what was mentioned above, and that is its accuracy of indication depends on two surfaces, maybe 3 in the design, otherwise its not effected.
That brings me to a point after some thought, one could use this tool straight in the boring head and let it swing from there, use that adjustment initially to set it up, then let it swing slowly and it will move but still faces you and get the job done uneffected, I never saw anybody uses it like this-?

Make a tool:
I can attemp to make such a tool shorter(More headroom) but then the indicator will sit sideways and not in path and upright, and it will not be accurate, but will only indicates movement of not being on centre, so you cannot off centre someting to an exact figure if you want to.

Wiggler:
I also thought of using the wiggler stiff tightened to indicate a circle, but not in the way a wiggler is normally used.

Lazer lights:

I also saw use of small lazer lights that just clip over spindle and shine a circle which you then position.
This seem interesting and easy.

What do you think-?.

Edited By Chris Mate on 20/08/2023 16:50:08
20 August 2023 at 17:20 #657235
DC31k
Participant
@dc31k
Posted by Chris Mate on 20/08/2023 16:34:39:

That brings me to a point after some thought, one could use this tool straight in the boring head and let it swing from there

I might be misunderstanding you here, but I do not think that would work.

The typical 50mm boring head has two vertical holes in it for the tools. One of those holes would have to be set (adjusted) concentric with the boring head's axis of rotation in order for it to be used to house a co-axial indicator (or even a standard edge finder).

You could use a standard lever DTI in the manner you describe but not something where the dial always faces you and the mechanism rotates.

When you use the point of the tool to find centre as you describe above, it is always a constant distance from the rotation axis.
20 August 2023 at 17:41 #657237
Michael Gilligan
Participant
@michaelgilligan61133
Posted by Chris Mate on 20/08/2023 16:34:39:
.

[…]

I also saw use of small lazer lights that just clip over spindle and shine a circle which you then position.
This seem interesting and easy.

What do you think-?.

.

There was a long and interesting discussion about laser centring devices on here a few years back.

… if you can’t find it, I will have a look later.

MichaelG.
20 August 2023 at 19:17 #657249
Chris Mate
Participant
@chrismate31303
Hi Michael,

A)The Lazer device is called "CentreQuick" centering …..

B)About your question regarding the ordinary coaxel centering devices operation.

-Normally they fitted to spindle/collet and spin internally as the spindle runs, mill motor running.
In this case you use it automatic way, it turns many revolotions around the spindles arc which you then compare to the hole you want to align the X/Y axis.

-My suggestion is if you fit this same tool to the Boring head itself, the mill motor stay switch off, you use it manually, meaning you turn spindle with hand and you confirm within one revolution for each revolution as now it follows whatever acr the boring head delivers to it as spindle is slowly turned by hand. The tool will move but not turn within an arc as it would if you switch the mill motor on, there is a difference. Maybe I am a bit stupid thinking here, but I will keep on thinking more about it. I can see the difference, you don't want an arc running within an arc so to speak. I am not an engineer, just wild thoughts for now, it may or may not be practical.

Edited By Chris Mate on 20/08/2023 19:18:40
20 August 2023 at 19:30 #657252
peak4
Participant
@peak4
I was going to post a link to the excellent Dan Gelbart video, but came across this which has the video embeded.
The relevant part is from about 2 min 20 on
https://www.printables.com/model/58546-dan-gelbart-laser-center

I don't have a 3D printer, but it might be of interest to those who do play with them.

Bill
20 August 2023 at 19:32 #657253
Michael Gilligan
Participant
@michaelgilligan61133
Posted by Chris Mate on 20/08/2023 19:17:37:

Hi Michael,

[…]

B)About your question regarding the ordinary coaxel centering devices operation.

[…]

.

That’s strange … I don’t recall asking a question

MichaelG.
20 August 2023 at 22:42 #657274
John McNamara
Participant
@johnmcnamara74883
Re the image on the link in peak4's post
https://www.printables.com/model/58546-dan-gelbart-laser-center

I like the spherical arrangement of the laser mount adjustments.
adjustment in two planes with two lock screws only.
That is a nice piece of design and part minimisation.

Not easy to machine but easy to 3D Print.
20 August 2023 at 23:00 #657275
Michael Gilligan
Participant
@michaelgilligan61133
Posted by Chris Mate on 20/08/2023 19:17:37:

Hi Michael,

A)The Lazer device is called "CentreQuick" centering …..

[…]

.

That took a bit of finding: **LINK**

https://www.centerquic.com

… but it basically looks like an interpretation of Dan Gelbart’s idea

MichaelG.
Author

Posts