I used M-DRO three times for work – 2 installations using a basic 2 axis display with one (Harrison lathe) using glass scales and the other (Tool pre-setter) using magnetic scales + another single axis basic counter with a magnetic slide unit on a large belt sander table.
The Harrison installation was a replacement for a failed Anilam display & was cheaper than getting a replacement head unit for the Anilam. The pre-setter was a replacement for two failed independant capacitive readouts. The belt sander was replacement for a capacitive readout that really didn't get along with graphite dust.
The only "issues" I had were calibrating the magnetic scales – one was mounted directly on an aluminium extrusion, the other on a stainless steel bar in place of the Trimos capacitive scales & neither read accurately when checked with slip gauges as installed, requiring use of the linear calibration feature in the head unit. This was a "do it once" requirement, so not really a problem. The head unit did fail to start up after a lengthy period of disuse once, but an e-mail to M-DRO got the issue sorted promptly (there was a "hidden" reset button ). The magnetic scale on th belt sander occasionally mis-read due to build-up of fine metallic dust on the scale (some man-made graphite has iron filings in the mix to increase strength) – easliy cured with a puff of compressed air.
For home use I have a Chinese Jingce 3 axis head unit & 5 micron glass scales for my FB2 clone milling machine. Only had it rigged up off the machine to make sure that it worked on arrival so far. I went this route because it was around half the price of an M-DRO equivalent & my pockets are not as deep as my former employer ! Time will tell if that was a false economy.
WRT resolution – the basic Heidenhain two axis systems used by Bridegport on manual turret mills were 10 micron resolution. Can't recall anyone suggesting that these were not adequate, so 5 micron should be more than adequate for a basic mill.
Nigel B.