Many thanks for the replies.
I appreciate its a bit of a hammer to crack an egg, but I guess the idea was to try milling curves, and as it was in wood, it seemed an ideal trial piece. But..in the three hours or so spent on it…it is not the best choice! So…although this is a very simple example, it is kind of like me learning to tie my laces, before becoming a marathon runner.
After reading the other replies…I am now more confused than ever..So have tried to sketch things out.
I get that the diameter of the cutter is larger than the scribing point..but surely they would have the same centre? So although it wouldn’t be the correct size, it would surely still be parallel? As in it would make a 7/8 inch diameter instead of a 1 inch? I am lining up the diameter to be cut by eye, to the outside diameter of the cutter. The scribing point was purely to ensure things lined up.
Again on the vertical slide, as you offset, that surely just changes the diameter? So if when central everything lines up, if you lower it by an inch, it would create inch radii’s?
My rather poor sketch..with fig 1 set up so everything is in line. Fig 2 being with the verticle slide offset. With in both cases the horizontal axis being the slides axis of rotation.
So to my sketch everything seems to work….but clearly I am wrong! And looking at the logic of the cutter diameter, that seems the answer, but I am missing a stage in the logic…
Thanks again,
Nicholas
